An aged natural-philosophy manuscript with botanical tea studies rests among mountain tea plants in warm morning light

02Three tea recipes

Grounded Knowledge

What supports a brewing recommendation?

Research behind the recipe

A knowledge graph connects sources, findings, and calculations. Open a recipe detail below to see what supports it—and what still needs testing.

From sources to a brewing suggestion

A physical knowledge graph: source materials connect through evidence and reasoning nodes to a tea trial, with unresolved and returning branches still visible.
SourceClaimReasoningRecipe to try
01

Gensen Tezumi Shincha

Kirishima · Saemidori

Status
Current best trial
Evidence
21 verified sources
Lineage
4 revisions
Confidence
Moderate
A pale glazed handleless hōhin, yuzamashi, three cups, and vivid steamed green tea leaves on a dark tea table
Setup 01Glazed hōhin · yuzamashi · three cups
Leaf4.2 g
Water120 ml
Kettle60 °C
Infusions75 · 10 · 15 · 30 s
01

Dose

1 linked claim
4.2 g / 120 ml
moderate

Adjusting the seller’s dose for this pot

Why this choice?Calculated value
The reasoning

3.5 g/100 ml seller-range midpoint scaled to 120 ml: 3.5 × 1.2 = 4.2 g.

What we don’t know

The new 60°C, 75-second brew has not been tasted yet. It could still be bitter or too weak.

GuidanceSeller’s brewing advice

The seller specifies approximately 3-4 g per 100 ml, 60-65°C water, and 1.5-2 minutes for Gensen Tezumi Shincha.

02

Extraction

3 linked claims
60 °C · 75 sec
weak

Trying a shorter brew after a bitter cup

Why this choice?Choice to test
The reasoning

The previous 105-second brew tasted quite bitter, so the next trial is shorter than the seller recommends. This timing has not been shown to taste best.

What we don’t know

The new 60°C, 75-second brew has not been tasted yet. It could still be bitter or too weak.

GuidanceSeller’s brewing advice

The seller specifies approximately 3-4 g per 100 ml, 60-65°C water, and 1.5-2 minutes for Gensen Tezumi Shincha.

ObservationPrevious tasting

The prior 65 °C / 105 s first infusion tasted quite bitter.

Private observation
GuidanceChange after tasting

The next trial deliberately reduces extraction after the bitter outcome.

Private observation
03

Vessel

4 linked claims
Glazed hōhin · full decant
moderate

A small pot with a fast-draining filter

Why this choice?Choice to test
The reasoning

This pot was chosen for its known capacity, glaze, and fast filter. It has not been shown to make better-tasting tea than the other pots.

What we don’t know

We do not yet know how the tea’s taste differs between the glazed hōhin, Hōryū, and Hokuryū pots.

ObservationHome measurement

A direct fill measurement confirmed the hōhin's working capacity.

Private observation
04

Water

3 linked claims
Lauretana
moderate

Keeping the water consistent

Why this choice?Choice to test
The reasoning

Lauretana is the water chosen for this home trial. Its recorded mineral content broadly fits the seller’s soft-water advice, but the current bottle label has not been checked independently.

What we don’t know

This recipe assumes Lauretana water. The mineral figures came from the user; the current bottle label has not been checked independently.

GuidanceSeller’s water advice

The seller recommends soft water, filtered if necessary, for full enjoyment of its rare green teas.

ObservationWater used at home

Lauretana is the explicit water constraint for this home trial.

Private observation
ObservationRecorded water details

The represented water options differ materially in mineral content; current labels remain unverified.

Private observation
02

Wuliang Palace Shou

Yunnan · ripe pu-erh

Status
Current best trial
Evidence
13 verified sources
Lineage
3 revisions
Confidence
Moderate
A dark zi-ni Xi Shi teapot, celadon pitcher, white and celadon cups, and loose ripe pu-erh on stone
Setup 02Zi-ni Xi Shi · celadon pitcher · porcelain cups
Leaf6 g
Water145 ml
Kettle100 °C
Infusions8 · 8 · 10 · 12 · 15 · 20 · 25 · 35 · 50 · 70 · 100 · 150 s
01

Vessel

2 linked claims
Dedicated Xi Shi · 145 ml
strong

A pot used only for this tea

Why this choice?From the source
The reasoning

I already have this Xi Shi pot and have used it only for this tea. That makes it a consistent choice, but does not prove it tastes better than porcelain.

What we don’t know

The 145 ml working fill comes from an older note and needs remeasuring. A side-by-side tasting is still needed to compare this pot with others.

ObservationPrevious use of this pot

The Xi Shi pot has been used only for this Wuliang tea.

Private observation
ObservationAvailable pot

A 200 ml Xi Shi zi-ni pot is represented as available.

Private observation
02

Heat

3 linked claims
145 ml · 100 °C
moderate

Boiling water, adjusted to the pot’s fill

Why this choice?Calculated value
The reasoning

This starts from general gongfu brewing guidance. The temperature when water reaches the leaves has not been measured.

What we don’t know

100°C is the kettle’s display reading, not a measured temperature at the leaves.

GuidanceSeller’s brewing advice

The seller specifies two well-heaped teaspoons in 150 ml at 100°C and a 30-second first infusion.

GuidanceGeneral pu-erh advice

A specialist pu-erh guide recommends 6 g per 100 ml and boiling water as a weight-based gongfu baseline.

FactKettle specification

Fellow specifies a 40–100°C range for the Stagg EKG Pro and says it maintains the selected target temperature.

03

Rinse

1 linked claim
2 × 3 sec
moderate

Following a ripe pu-erh rinsing guide

Why this choice?Calculated value
The reasoning

Three seconds is the upper end of the guide’s two-to-three-second range, chosen to make the rinse easy to repeat.

What we don’t know

This advice is for ripe pu-erh generally. Its benefit for this particular tea has not been tested.

GuidanceRinsing advice

A specialist ripe-pu-erh guide recommends two rinses and states a two-to-three-second rinse duration.

04

Timing

2 linked claims
8 · 8 · 10 · 12 · 15 · 20 · 25 · 35 · 50 · 70 · 100 · 150 s
weak

An infusion schedule still to test

Why this choice?Choice to test
The reasoning

The schedule lengthens successive infusions, following the seller’s general advice. The exact times are a proposal to taste and test.

What we don’t know

The first brew at 6.0 g/145 ml, a 100°C kettle setting, and 8 seconds has not been tasted yet.

GuidanceEarlier AI-generated recipe

These exact brew times came from an earlier AI-generated recipe. They have not been established as the best timings.

Private observation
AssessmentRecipe proposed for testing

This recipe combines the available guidance into a trial. It has not been shown to taste best.

Private observation
03

Qing Xiang Tie Guan Yin

Anxi · light-roast oolong

Status
Current best trial
Evidence
14 verified sources
Lineage
3 revisions
Confidence
Moderate
A white porcelain gaiwan, celadon pitcher, tasting cup, and tightly rolled green oolong leaves on stone
Setup 03Porcelain gaiwan · celadon pitcher · white cup
Leaf5 g
Water60 ml
Kettle98 °C
Infusions5 · 7 · 9 · 12 · 15 · 20 · 30 s
01

Outcome

3 linked claims
5 g · 60 ml
moderate

Returning to a dose I enjoyed

Why this choice?From the source
The reasoning

After the 7 g brew disappointed, this returns to a dose I previously enjoyed rather than trying an even denser, untested recipe.

What we don’t know

The first three brews at 5.0 g/60 ml, 98°C, and 5/7/9 seconds, using this water blend, have not been tasted under the new timing method.

ObservationTasting result

A 7 g / 90 ml / 20 s first infusion was borderline bitter and lacked the expected floral and umami character.

Private observation
ObservationEarlier tasting result

The lighter prior protocol had produced enjoyable results.

Private observation
AssessmentChange after tasting

After the bitter result, this trial returns to the previously enjoyed recipe. Its remaining uncertainties still apply.

Private observation
02

Extraction

2 linked claims
98 °C · 5 · 7 · 9 · 12 · 15 · 20 · 30 s
weak

Shorter brews, not a proven ideal timing

Why this choice?Choice to test
The reasoning

A 20-second brew was bitter, so this returns to shorter infusions I had enjoyed before. The cited studies do not establish these exact timings.

What we don’t know

Later brew times, whether rinsing improves taste, and whether cooler water helps a bitter, flat cup still need testing.

Study findingEffects of brewing conditions

In the cited long-infusion Tieguanyin experiment, a higher water-to-tea ratio or lower temperature produced less bitterness-astringency; the tested range did not include five-second gongfu infusions.

AssessmentChange after tasting

After the bitter result, this trial returns to the previously enjoyed recipe. Its remaining uncertainties still apply.

Private observation
03

Leaf opening

1 linked claim
Evaluate infusions 1–3 together
weak

Taste the first three infusions together

Why this choice?Choice to test
The reasoning

In the study, dry leaves first had to absorb water, limiting extraction in the first brew. Taste the first three together rather than expecting the first cup to show all the floral and umami notes.

What we don’t know

The first three brews at 5.0 g/60 ml, 98°C, and 5/7/9 seconds, using this water blend, have not been tasted under the new timing method.

Study findingHow dry leaves absorb water

In the cited three-infusion Tieguanyin experiment, first-infusion extraction was harder because dry leaves first absorbed water, so the first cup alone may underrepresent later release.

04

Water

3 linked claims
75 : 925 blend · no Epsom
weak

Reusing a water blend I enjoyed

Why this choice?Choice to test
The reasoning

This reuses a water blend I previously enjoyed. Its exact mineral content has not been verified, and it may not match the waters in the study.

What we don’t know

Neither bottle’s current label or exact mineral content has been checked. We do not know whether the blend matches the moderately mineralized waters in the study.

Study findingWater and aroma

In a six-minute Tieguanyin brewing study, the moderately mineralized natural and spring waters tested gave better aroma results than the pure and highly mineralized waters tested. This does not establish the right composition for this recipe’s blend.

GuidanceEarlier recipe

The prior protocol records the 5 g dose, 60 ml working fill, water blend, rinse, and short infusion ladder.

Private observation
AssessmentChange after tasting

After the bitter result, this trial returns to the previously enjoyed recipe. Its remaining uncertainties still apply.

Private observation

AI comparison

Does the research help AI?

11 models · 2 tea questions · scores out of 100

  1. 01GPT-5.5 · xhigh
    AI alone83.9
    With graph79.2
    -4.6change
    Σ 163.1
  2. 02GLM-5.2 · reason 16k
    AI alone82.3
    With graph80.8
    -1.4change
    Σ 163.1
  3. 03Kimi K2.6 · auto
    AI alone75.8
    With graph79.6
    +3.8change
    Σ 155.4
  4. 04Gemini 3.1 Pro · dynamic
    AI alone78.6
    With graph75.0
    -3.6change
    Σ 153.6
  5. 05Ornith 1.0 35B · native
    AI alone77.4
    With graph72.4
    -5.0change
    Σ 149.8
  6. 06Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B · high
    AI alone59.5
    With graph83.1
    +23.6change
    Σ 142.5
  7. 07Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B BF16 · high
    AI alone68.3
    With graph62.1
    -6.3change
    Σ 130.4
  8. 08Gemma 4 31B BF16
    AI alone56.9
    With graph67.9
    +11.1change
    Σ 124.8
  9. 09GPT-OSS 120B · high
    AI alone66.3
    With graph50.6
    -15.7change
    Σ 116.9
  10. 10MiMo V2.5 · reason 16k
    AI alone53.8
    With graph61.1
    +7.3change
    Σ 114.9
  11. 11Phi-4
    AI alone37.5
    With graph38.5
    +1.0change
    Σ 76.0
AI aloneAI with access to the graph

Each model answers the same questions with and without the graph. One answer per question in each setting; sorted by the sum of both scores.

Other tests

More AI comparisons